periodontalchart-online.com – User Manual
Version 1.0 · 23.03.2026 · Author: Prof. Dr. Christoph A. Ramseier
About this Guide
periodontalchart-online.com is the official Periodontal Chart from perio-tools.com, free of charge and available in more than 30 languages; the same application runs in German at parodontalstatus.ch. It records the periodontal and peri-implant chart at six sites per tooth or implant, displays it graphically and evaluates it – classification, comparison of two charts, recall interval and calibration exercise. The data remain in the browser; they are not transmitted to a server.
Which measures are suitable for monitoring after active therapy, and why the application records exactly these, is described in the following review. It places probing, bleeding on probing, radiographs, biomarkers and microbiological tests in context and describes the application periodontalchart-online.com as a tool for this follow-up monitoring.
Ramseier, C. A. (2024). Diagnostic measures for monitoring and follow-up in periodontology and implant dentistry. Periodontology 2000, 95(1), 129–155. doi:10.1111/prd.12588. PubMed
The guide follows the structure of the application: Part A describes where the charts are stored, Part B recording them, Part C evaluating them, Part D the further charts and Part E assessing the history. All figures are generated from the code of the application itself, not photographed; the personal data shown are fictitious.
2. Periodontal Chart Tab
The Periodontal Chart tab is used for recording and visualizing the clinical periodontal examination. It allows the entry of patient information and clinical measurements and the visualization of the chart.
Print – Opens the print view of the chart. It is set up specifically for this and outputs the periodontal chart to fit the page.
Export – Saves the chart as a file on your device.
Load – Reads a previously saved chart back in.
Save – Writes the chart to the browser's storage. Without this step, the recorded data is lost when you close the application.
Delete – Removes the open chart. The patient record itself is retained.
Indices – Selects which clinical indices appear in the chart table, such as recessions, keratinized gingiva or tooth mobility.
Settings – Opens the window with the sign convention for the gingival margin, the tooth numbering system, mirroring and the probing sequence.
PD/BOP – Switches between the full chart table and the reduced view with probing depth and bleeding. The blue background shows that the reduced view is currently active.
PDF Import – Reads measurements from a PDF, for example from practice management software.
Copy – Transfers values from the previous chart. The button is gray as long as no earlier examination exists or the five-minute time window has expired.
Patient and Examination Details
At the top there are input fields for the patient details, the name of the examiner and the type of examination (initial examination or re-evaluation).
Recording Teeth and Implants
- Missing teeth: Click on the tooth number to mark the tooth as missing (crossed out).
- Implant status: Use the implant button to cycle through the states:
- First click: implant present
- Second click: implant marked red (e.g. peri-implantitis)
- Third click: implant marked green (e.g. successfully treated peri-implantitis)
- Fourth click: the implant is removed and the position returns to the natural tooth
Per Tooth/Implant
- Tooth Number – one click marks the tooth as missing; it is then shown in gray, like tooth 18 here. Another click removes the marking.
- Mobility – degree of mobility according to Miller, 0 to 3. In the example, tooth 17 has grade 2.
- Implant – the button steps through the states: first present, then marked red for peri-implantitis, then green after successful treatment, then a natural tooth again. The symbol in the table always stays black; the color appears on the implant. In the example, 15 (marked red) and 11 carry an implant. As long as an implant is set, the application hides the tooth mobility.
- Furcation Grade 1 – the probe detects a concavity but does not enter it.
- Furcation Grade 2 – the probe enters but does not pass through. In the example buccally at tooth 16.
- Furcation Grade 3 – through and through. In the example palatally at tooth 16.
Per Site
- Bleeding on Probing – six sites per tooth/implant. A click on the row label fills the entire row, shift and click clears it again.
- Plaque Index – six sites per tooth/implant. A click on the row label fills the entire row, shift and click clears it again.
Measurements (mm)
- Gingival Margin – position of the gingival margin relative to the cemento-enamel junction in millimeters. Negative values mean that the margin lies above it.
- Probing Depth – red from 4 mm upward, so that increased probing depths stand out.
- Attachment Level – the application calculates it as the sum of probing depth and gingival margin and therefore shows it on a gray background: it is not entered.
For supportive periodontal therapy, the same chart can be kept in a compact form. The button PD/BOP in the controls (Figure 5) switches between the full periodontal chart and this shortened view; its label always names the view that the next click leads to – in the full chart it reads PD/BOP, in the shortened view Status. The name of the tab changes with it.
In the PD/BOP view, gingival margin and attachment level are omitted, and the two tooth views with the curves are replaced by a single occlusal view of the dental arch, on which each surface is colored separately. Only probing depths of 4 mm and above are recorded; all other sites remain at 0. This keeps data entry at recall short without losing the sites that stand out.
Clinical Parameters and Indices
Measurements are typically recorded at six sites per tooth. The application supports various clinical indices, which are categorized as follows:
Probing Depth, Gingival Margin and Attachment Level
Probing depths in mm (measured)
Gingival Margin in mm (measured)
Attachment Level in mm (calculated)
Oral Hygiene
Plaque Index according to O'Leary et al. (1972)
Plaque Index according to Silness and Löe (1964)
Plaque Index according to Mombelli et al. (1987)
Gingivitis and Peri-implant Mucositis
Bleeding on Probing according to Lang et al. (1986)
Gingival Index according to Löe and Silness (1963)
Gingival Index according to Mombelli at al. (1987)
Recessions
Recession value according to Miller (1985)
Recession value according to Cairo et al. (2011)
Custom recession value (2 values per tooth)
Keratinised Gingiva (Mucogingival Junction) in mm (measured)
Gingival Thickness (Phenotype)
Width in mm (measured) according to Pandey & Mehta (2013)
Visibility of Cemento-Enamel Junction
Concavity of the root surface
Custom recession value (6 values per tooth)
1. Probing Depth, Gingival Margin and Attachment Level
- PD (Probing Depth): Measured in millimeters at 6 sites per tooth.
- GM (Gingival Margin): Measured in millimeters relative to the cementoenamel junction (CEJ).
- AL (Attachment Level): Calculated automatically as the sum of PD and GM (AL = PD + GM).
2. Oral Hygiene Indices
- Plaque (O'Leary et al. 1972): Binary recording (0/1) for calculating the oral hygiene status (plaque index). [Default]
- PI (Silness and Löe 1964): Plaque index for assessing the plaque thickness at the gingival margin.
- mPI (Mombelli et al. 1987): Modified plaque index, developed specifically for dental implants.
3. Gingivitis and Peri-Implant Mucositis
- BOP (Bleeding on Probing): Bleeding on probing according to Lang et al. (1986), recorded as 0 (no bleeding) or 1 (bleeding). [Default]
- GI (Gingival Index): Assessment of gingival inflammation according to Löe and Silness (1963).
- mGI (Modified Gingival Index): Assessment of inflammation at implants according to Mombelli et al. (1987).
4. Recessions and Advanced Parameters
Additional indices are available for clinical practice and clinical studies in order to record parameters at either 2 or 6 sites per tooth:
- REC Mi: Recession classification according to Miller (1985).
- REC Ca: Recession classification according to Cairo et al. (2011).
- REC X / REC Y: Custom recession values (2 or 6 values per tooth).
- KG (MGJ): Width of the keratinized gingiva (mucogingival junction) in mm.
- GT (Gingival Thickness): Assessment of the gingival phenotype (thin/thick).
- W (Width): Measured width in mm according to Pandey & Mehta (2013).
- CEJ: Documentation of the visibility of the cementoenamel junction.
- Step: Assessment of concavities of the root surface.
- Furcation involvement: Horizontal probing of the furcation entrance with the furcation probe, classified into grades 0 to 3 according to Hamp et al. (1975). Grade 1 up to 3 mm, grade 2 more than 3 mm, grade 3 through and through.
- Tooth mobility: Measured bidigitally and classified into grades 0 to 3 according to Miller (1950).
Hamp S. E., Nyman S., Lindhe J., Periodontal treatment of multirooted teeth. Results after 5 years. J. Clin. Periodontol. 1975;2:126–135. doi:10.1111/j.1600-051X.1975.tb01734.x. PubMed
Miller S. C., Textbook of Periodontia, 3rd edition, The Blakiston Co., Philadelphia and Toronto, 1950.
- Clicking on the labels "Bleeding on Probing" or "Plaque Index" fills the corresponding row completely with positive values (BOP+ or PI+).
- With Shift-click on these labels, all entries in the row are deleted again.
- In addition, the Shift key can be held down while moving the mouse over the BOP or plaque surfaces in order to activate or deactivate these sites selectively.
Copying Values from the Previous Chart
When creating a new chart for a patient who already has existing examinations, the system offers a dropdown menu "Copy Values" . This function is particularly useful for transferring baseline data that may not have changed since the last visit:
- Parameters: You can selectively copy the tooth status (including implants), furcation grades, Probing Depths (PD), Gingival Margin (GM), Bleeding on Probing (BOP) and Plaque Index (PI).
- Availability: This copy function is available for a time window of 5 minutes after the new chart has been created.
- Reversibility: The transfer is interactive: clicking the same entry in the dropdown again immediately undoes the data transfer.
Copy values from the last examination
Copies tooth status and implant information.
Copies furcation grades.
Copies probing depth values.
Copies Gingival Margin values.
Copies Bleeding on Probing values.
Copies Plaque Index values.
Dictation with the audio widget
The Periodontal Chart can be dictated in full. The audio widget is located in the header next to the logo. Clicking the microphone button starts the recording, clicking it again ends it; the spoken word "Stop" does the same. This is useful chairside, where your hands are on the patient and a second person would otherwise have to write the values down.
Live mode and batch mode
The green label next to the microphone button names the current mode and switches it when clicked; so do the spoken commands "Live mode" and "Batch mode".
- Live: Every recognized word is entered at once. You see immediately whether it was understood correctly.
- Batch: The words are collected and entered together only after a pause of about one and a half seconds. This is calmer when you dictate a whole row of teeth in one go.
The voice commands
The arrow on the right of the widget opens the full list. It covers the tooth roll call, mobility, implants and furcations, the values for bleeding and plaque, and the targeted start at a specific site. With "Start 17 distobuccal" you set the focus exactly where you begin probing; data entry then moves along the configured probing sequence.
Personalized Speech Training
If the engine persistently misrecognizes a word, enter the pair of expected command and misrecognized text in the lower part of the widget. From then on, the system replaces the incorrect text automatically before evaluating it. The learned terms remain stored in the browser and can be transferred via Export and Import as a file to another device.
Periodontal Classification
Provides an automatic diagnostic suggestion (stage and grade) according to Tonetti et al. (2018). The system analyzes clinical parameters such as the molar-incisor pattern, the distribution of probing depths, smoking status and the stability of diabetes.
Periodontitis Classification: Bbb Bbb, born 12.12.2000 (25 years)
Diagnosis: Advanced Periodontitis, Stage IV
Initial Periodontitis
Moderate Periodontitis
Severe Periodontitis with potential for additional tooth loss
Advanced Periodontitis with extensive tooth loss and potential for loss of the dentition
(<15%)
(15–33%)
4–5 mm
Mostly horizontal bone loss
4–5 mm
Mostly horizontal bone loss
Probing depth ≥ 6 mm
Vertical bone loss ≥ 3 mm
Furcation involvement Class II or III
Moderate ridge defect
Need for complex rehabilitation due to:
Masticatory dysfunction
Secondary occlusal trauma (tooth mobility ≥ degree 2)
Severe ridge defect
Bite collapse, drifting, flaring
Fewer than 20 remaining teeth (10 opposing pairs)
(< 30% of the teeth)
(≥ 30% of the teeth)
Slow rate of progression
Moderate rate of progression
Rapid rate of progression
(radiographic bone loss or attachment loss)
divided by age
Clinical pattern suggests periods of rapid progression and/or early-onset disease (e.g. molar/incisor pattern; lack of the expected response to standard control therapies)
• Maximum probing depth: 11 mm (36 dl) → Complexity: Stage 3
• Approximal attachment loss: 12 mm (36 dl) → Severity: ≥ 5 mm
• Distribution: 100.0 % of the teeth (27/27) affected → generalized
• Bone loss/age: 85.7 % / 25 = 3.43 → Grade C
Tonetti, M. S., Greenwell H., Kornman K. S. (2018). Staging and grading of periodontitis: Framework and proposal of a new classification and case definition. Journal of Periodontology. 89(1), 159-172. doi: 10.1002/JPER.18-0006.
Overview
A visualization focusing on Plaque Index (PI%) and Bleeding on Probing (BOP%) for the current data set. The Overview can be downloaded as an image.
3. Evaluation
Automatic Calculations
In the middle of the Periodontal Chart, summaries are calculated automatically:
- Mean Probing Depth (one decimal place)
- Mean Attachment Level (one decimal place)
- BOP percentage (BOP%)
- Plaque Index percentage (PI%)
Comparative Overlay
Controls
Various controls highlight specific clinical parameters or control the image export:
Image export
- Complete chart – downloads the maxilla and the mandible together as an image.
- Upper Jaw – downloads the upper arch only.
- Lower Jaw – downloads the lower arch only.
Highlights in the chart
- Plaque – highlights all sites with a positive plaque index.
- BOP – highlights all bleeding sites. In the figure this button is switched on; the active one has a blue background. Only one highlight can be shown at a time.
- 5mm – marks probing depths of 5 mm and more.
- ≥6mm – marks probing depths of 6 mm and more. Together the two show at a glance where the residual pockets are.
Further calculation
- PRA – passes the values of the current examination to the risk diagram on perio-tools.com. How this works is described in the next section.
Periodontal Risk Assessment (PRA)
This button opens www.perio-tools.com with the parameter i and the values from the current examination.
https://www.perio-tools.com/pra/?lang=en&i=0000000032000
Analysis
Analysis of the Periodontal Status Data
Number of teeth:
Plaque Index (%):
Probing Depths 4mm (%):
Probing Depths 5mm (%):
Probing depths ≥6mm (%):
Probing Depths (mean):
Recessions (mean):
Attachment Level (mean):
Bleeding on Probing (%):
09.08.2026
27
85 %
18.5 %
17.3 %
25.9 %
4.6 mm
-0.5 mm
-5.0 mm
96 %
16.08.2026
24
26 %
12.5 %
3.5 %
4.2 %
2.9 mm
-1.2 mm
-4.2 mm
40 %
Change in probing depths (PD) and BOP
| Initial Exam (mm) | Re-evaluation (mm) | Change (mm) | Pockets (number) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ≤2 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 6 |
| 3 | 2.45 | -0.55 | 53 |
| 4 | 2.54 | -1.46 | 26 |
| 5 | 3.32 | -1.68 | 25 |
| 6 | 3.33 | -2.67 | 15 |
| 7 | 4.20 | -2.80 | 10 |
| 8 | 3.50 | -4.50 | 4 |
| 9 | 4.67 | -4.33 | 3 |
| ≥10 | 5.00 | -5.00 | 2 |
Correlation and distribution
Pearson r = 0.94, df = 4, p = 0.9975, 95% CI: [0.5502, 2.8818]
| PD / BOP | BOP reduced | BOP unch. | BOP incr. |
|---|---|---|---|
| PD reduced | 67 | 41 | 0 |
| PD unch. | 13 | 17 | 1 |
| PD incr. | 2 | 3 | 0 |
χ2 = 7.6152, df = 4, p = 0.1067
The system provides a comprehensive comparison between the two examinations:
- Color coding: Green indicates a clinical improvement, blue represents residual pockets and red marks a clinical deterioration.
- Change in bleeding: A dashed diagonal represents the expected correlation between probing depth and bleeding. The analysis follows the shift in bleeding intensity, statistically confirmed by a chi-square test.
Recall Interval
Determines the recommended recall schedule based on Ramseier et al. (2019). The risk calculation takes into account the probing profile, systemic factors (smoking, diabetes) and furcation involvement (grade ≥2). Results can be downloaded as an image.
Three studies stand behind this calculation. The length of the interval is derived from the residual pockets and the time between visits (Ramseier et al. 2019). The bleeding on probing is included as a measure of the inflammation – note that smokers bleed less at the same disease severity and that the value there is lower than the chart warrants (Ramseier et al. 2015). The furcation involvement is counted from grade 2 upwards, because multi-rooted teeth carry a markedly increased risk of loss only from this grade – grade 1 does not differ from grade 0 in this respect (Salvi et al. 2014).
Ramseier, C. A., Nydegger, M., Walter, C., Fischer, G., Sculean, A., Lang, N. P., Salvi, G. E. (2019). Time between recall visits and residual probing depths predict long-term stability in patients enrolled in supportive periodontal therapy. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 46(2), 218–230. doi:10.1111/jcpe.13041. PubMed
Ramseier, C. A., Mirra, D., Schütz, C., Sculean, A., Lang, N. P., Walter, C., Salvi, G. E. (2015). Bleeding on probing as it relates to smoking status in patients enrolled in supportive periodontal therapy for at least 5 years. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 42(2), 150–159. doi:10.1111/jcpe.12344. PubMed
Salvi, G. E., Mischler, D. C., Schmidlin, K., Matuliene, G., Pjetursson, B. E., Brägger, U., & Lang, N. P. (2014). Risk factors associated with the longevity of multi-rooted teeth. Long-term outcomes after active and supportive periodontal therapy. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 41(7), 701–707. doi:10.1111/jcpe.12266. PubMed
Evaluation
| 4mm | 5mm | ≥6mm | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Pockets | 18 | 5 | 6 |
| Pockets (%) | 12.5 | 3.5 | 4.2 |
| Cumulative (%) | 20.2 | 7.7 | 4.2 |
| ≥4mm | ≥5mm | ≥6mm | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months | ≤ 30% | ≤ 20% | ≤ 4% |
| 4 months | ≤ 20% | ≤ 10% | ≤ 3% |
| 6 months | ≤ 20% | ≤ 6% | ≤ 2% |
| 9 months | ≤ 10% | ≤ 4% | ≤ 1% |
| 12 months | ≤ 10% | ≤ 2% | ≤ 1% |
Personalized Recall Interval
3D Visualization
Renders a 3D model of the periodontal surface, documents the total periodontal surface area (TPSA) in cm² and analyzes BOP-positive vs. BOP-negative surfaces. The model can be zoomed, rotated and exported as a GLTF file for virtual reality (VR) or augmented reality (AR) applications.
Surface Analysis
Inflamed: 8.1 cm2 (61.1%)
Buccal and Oral: 5.9 cm2 (100%)
Inflamed: 4.6 cm2 (77.2%)
Interdental Spaces: 7.3 cm2 (100%)
Inflamed: 3.5 cm2 (48.0%)
Below it the application sums up the same surfaces. The large square is the total periodontal surface area, here 13.2 cm²; the red portion from below is the 8.1 cm² at which bleeding occurs, that is 61 percent. The two small squares divide the same area: at the top the buccal and oral surfaces, at the bottom the interdental spaces, in the lighter tones. The comparison is worthwhile because the plain BOP percentage conceals it: buccally and orally 77 percent of the surface bleeds, in the interdental spaces 48 percent – but the interdental spaces are, with 7.3 cm², the larger surface.
Surface Analysis
Follow-up: 13.2 cm2 (56.0%)
Buccal and Oral: 11.0 cm2 (100%)
Follow-up: 5.9 cm2 (53.8%)
Interdental Spaces: 12.6 cm2 (100%)
Follow-up: 7.3 cm2 (57.9%)
In this mode the three squares read differently than in Figure 19: green is now the first chart as a whole, blue the portion of it that is still left at the second chart. Of 23.6 cm², 13.2 cm² have remained, that is 56 percent; the periodontal surface has almost halved. Buccally and orally it is 54 percent, in the interdental spaces 58 percent – the interdental spaces have thus gained somewhat less, although with 12.6 cm² they were the larger initial surface.
QR Code Sharing
Generates a QR code for the current chart, which can be displayed on mobile devices in a responsive web viewer.
API Access
The aim of this API is to make the online periodontal chart accessible to external applications (e.g. practice management software). A generated link transmits anonymized chart data and visualizes it directly in the viewer.
Base URL
https://www.periodontalchart-online.com/api/
Query String Parameter
The query string is transmitted via the parameter i and contains the anonymized and compressed data of the periodontal chart.
Example URL
https://www.periodontalchart-online.com/api/?i=5051505050...
You will find detailed technical documentation of the API here: API Documentation.
Examiner Calibration
Two charts of the same person, recorded shortly one after the other, can be compared with each other: what differs does not go back to the patient but to the measuring. That is exactly what the calibration examines. It is suitable for two examiners (Inter-Examiner) as well as for two rounds by the same person (Intra-Examiner) and is used in the training of dentists and dental hygienists.
The application places each site of the two charts side by side and calculates from them the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for each parameter as well as a Bland-Altman plot for the probing depths. The two answer different questions: the ICC says how closely the two measurements agree overall; the plot shows where they diverge – whether evenly across all depths or only at the deep pockets.
How to read the plot: Each bubble stands for one or more sites. Horizontally lies the mean of the two measurements, that is roughly how deep the pocket is; vertically the difference, that is how far apart the two lie. A bubble on the zero line means agreement. The turquoise line is the mean difference – if it lies clearly away from zero, one person measures consistently deeper than the other. The two red lines are the limits of agreement (mean ± 1.96 standard deviations); around 95 % of the sites should lie between them, the remaining ones appear in red.
Two charts must be selected in the Navigation Panel for this – the second with the Shift key held down. The result can be downloaded as an image and thus serves as documentation for a calibration exercise or for the methods section of a study.
Comparison of Periodontal Measurements
The 10 largest deviations
The following sites show the largest deviations:
| Gingival Margin | Δmm | Probing Depths | Δmm | Furcations | ΔGrade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 33 db | 4 | 23 mp | 5 | 16 dp | 2 |
| 33 b | 3 | 24 mp | 5 | 14 mp | 1 |
| 21 mb | 2 | 36 mb | 5 | 24 dp | 1 |
| 27 db | 2 | 25 mp | 4 | 27 b | 1 |
| 34 db | 2 | 45 ml | 4 | 36 b | 1 |
| 36 ml | 2 | 47 ml | 4 | 36 l | 1 |
| 11 mb | 1 | 12 mp | 3 | 37 l | 1 |
| 11 dp | 1 | 15 dp | 3 | 47 b | 1 |
| 12 db | 1 | 22 mb | 3 | 47 l | 1 |
| 12 mb | 1 | 24 dp | 3 | ||
Bland-Altman plot (probing depths)
The plot sets the difference between two measurements of the probing depth against their mean. Blue circles lie within the thresholds, red ones outside; the circle size stands for the number of sites.
Analysis of the agreement
The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) assesses the degree of agreement. A value close to 1 indicates high agreement, a value close to 0 low agreement.
| Gingival Margin | Probing Depths | Furcations |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Agreement: ICC ≥0.90 excellent, ≥0.75 good, ≥0.50 moderate, <0.50 poor.
Mean Deviations
Entire Dentition
| Gingival Margin Δmm | Probing Depth Δmm | Furcation ΔGrade |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
The same breakdown follows once more in the window for anterior teeth, premolars and molars.
Summary
- Gingival Margin: The agreement between the measurements is good.
- Probing Depths: The agreement between the measurements is moderate.
- Furcations: The agreement between the measurements is good.
4. General Health Tab
Structure of the questionnaire
The list covers a wide range of medical questions, which can be expanded or collapsed as needed. Individual health areas are divided into sections that can be managed independently for a better overview.
Data storage and export
For each chart, all selections in the health questionnaire are stored and time-stamped individually. These data are fully integrated into the data export function so that medical information can be analyzed statistically together with clinical periodontal parameters.
Customization (Questionnaire Editor)
The entire questionnaire can be fully customized with the Editor button as follows:
- Editing: Add new questions, create custom dropdown menus or define new categories.
- Flexibility: Completely new health forms can be created, which makes the application ideal for data collection in clinical studies.
- Reset: If required, the questionnaire can be returned to its default state at any time.
Adjust the structure of the health questionnaire here. Changes are stored locally.
5. Microbiology Tab
Potentially periodontopathogenic bacteria: P.m., F.n., C.r., E.n., E.c., C.sp.
Recording the Pathogens
The system allows the load to be recorded for 12 different pathogens. Data entry is based on exponents (e.g. entering 4, 5 or 6 for 104, 105 or 106). A value of 0 means that the pathogen was not detected.
Visualization (Polygon Chart)
The findings are visualized in a 12-sided polygon chart (spider chart), which provides an immediate overview of the patient's microbiological profile.
Microbiological Shift (Comparison View)
When two charts are selected for comparison (SHIFT+click in the Navigation Panel), the Microbiology tab visualizes the shift between the two time points:
- Green shading: Represents the microbiological profile of the first examination.
- Blue shading: Represents the profile of the second examination (follow-up chart).
This overlay makes it easy to visualize the reduction or the clinical shift of pathogens after treatment.
6. History Tab
The History tab provides a comprehensive longitudinal view of all periodontal charts of a patient, in reverse chronological order (most recent chart first).
Comparative Visualization
Each data set shows the probing and bleeding findings on the left and the oral hygiene findings (plaque) on the right, side by side, to allow a straightforward comparison.
Between two charts the application also assesses the interval: it compares the interval derived from the residual pockets with the actual one and reports, according to Ramseier et al. (2019), whether the follow-up appointment took place early, on time or late.
Change Analysis (Arrow Buttons)
Clicking on the arrow buttons between two charts inserts a visual analysis of the clinical changes:
- Color coding:
- Green/light green: Significant clinical improvement.
- Yellow: Stable (no change).
- Pink/dark pink: Clinical deterioration of the probing depths.
- Closed pockets: The analysis identifies "closed pockets", defined as sites with a probing depth of ≤4 mm and without bleeding on probing (BOP).
- Ranking tables: The toggle switches between distribution data (Table 1) and a ranking of the sites with the greatest need for treatment (Table 2).
| Table 1/2 | Before | After | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | Mar 2025 | Oct 2025 | 7 month(s) (213 days) |
| Teeth | 24 | 24 | 0 |
| 4 mm | 9 | 16 | +7 |
| closed | 9 | 10 | +1 |
| 5 mm | 0 | 1 | +1 |
| from 6 mm | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Furcation Grade 1 | 4 | 2 | -2 |
| Furcation Grade 2 | 0 | 1 | +1 |
| Furcation Grade 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Implants | 1 | 2 | +1 |
Interactive Tools
- Animation loop: Use the Play/Pause/Loop buttons to visualize the course of disease and healing in a time-lapse overlay.
- Heatmap: Highlights sites with frequent bleeding or plaque across several examinations.
- Risk indicators: The exclamation mark button marks sites with repeated bleeding (BOP), which indicates an increased risk of further attachment loss (Lang 1986).
Reports and AI Integration
- Stability assessment: Generates a patient-friendly report in plain language on the current periodontal stability and the recommended recall profile.
- AI chart report: The AI button generates an anonymized clinical prompt based on the patient's charts. Users can copy this prompt or open Google Gemini directly to create a clinical report in natural language by copy and paste.
How stable are your gums?
Assessment of your periodontal stability
Periodontal stability is possibly not fully achieved. The following points deviate from the stability target:
- Oral hygiene, at 25.7%, is above the target value of 20%.
- There are still 4.2% residual pockets of 6mm and more.
- Furcations Grade 2 or higher are present.
- Inflammation (BOP: 41%) is above the target value (20%).
Oral Hygiene (%)
With a plaque index of 25.7%, oral hygiene still leaves room for improvement (target: below 20%). Pay closer attention to your daily tooth cleaning and follow the instructions you have received.
Probing Depths (%)
There are still 4.2% residual pockets of 6mm and more, which could make further treatment necessary. Discuss possible options for stabilization with your dental professional.
Furcations (number)
Furcations of grade 2 or 3 were found, which represent an increased risk of tooth loss. Discuss suitable measures with your dental professional.
Inflammation (%)
With a BOP value of 41%, inflammation is increased (target: below 20%). Discuss with your dental professional how the inflammation can be specifically reduced.
Summary Notes
The following steps could be necessary for periodontal stabilization:
- improvement of oral hygiene (below 20%)
- reduction of residual pockets ≥ 6mm through further treatment (provided oral hygiene is improved)
- an assessment of the grade 2 or 3 furcations with regard to surgical correction options (with improved oral hygiene)
- a reduction of the inflammation below 20% (after prior reduction of the residual pockets)
Prompt for Gemini (Google), ChatGPT (OpenAI), etc.:
Language: English ▾
Create an understandable and respectful summary of the periodontal condition of a patient with the following data: Plaque index: 25.7% (target value: <20%) Probing depths of 6mm and more: 4.2% Bleeding (BOP): 41% (target value: <20%) Number of affected furcations of grade 2 or 3: 3 Please:\n- explain to the patient in understandable terms what these values mean\n- point out the connections between oral hygiene, residual pockets and inflammation\n- point out the need to reduce any risk factors that may be present, such as smoking tobacco products, snus or poorly controlled diabetes\n- refrain from medical recommendations or diagnoses\n- use a neutral, factual, motivating language Create the summary in this language: English
7. References
The following scientific references were used to establish the clinical indices and algorithms in the online Periodontal Chart. The PubMed links open the entry in the database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine in a new tab. The two textbooks are not listed there.
- Textbook of Periodontia. 3rd ed. Miller SC (1950). Philadelphia: Blakiston.
- Löe H, Silness J. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. I. Prevalence and severity. Acta Odontol Scand. 1963;21:533-551 PubMed
- Silness J, Löe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition. Acta Odontol Scand. 1964;22:121-135 PubMed
- O'Leary TJ, Drake RB, Naylor JE. The plaque control record. J Periodontol. 1972;43:38 PubMed
- Hamp SE, Nyman S, Lindhe J. Periodontal treatment of multirooted teeth. Results after 5 years. J Clin Periodontol. 1975;2:126-135 PubMed
- Miller PD, Jr. A classification of marginal tissue recession. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1985;5:8-13 PubMed
- Lang NP, Joss A, Orsanic T, Gusberti FA, Siegrist BE. Bleeding on probing. A predictor for the progression of periodontal disease? J Clin Periodontol. 1986;13:590-596 PubMed
- Mombelli A, van Oosten MA, Schurch E, Jr., Lang NP. The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1987;2:145-151 PubMed
- Cairo F, Nieri M, Cincinelli S, Mervelt J, Pagliaro U. The interproximal clinical attachment level to classify gingival recessions and predict root coverage outcomes: an explorative and reliability study. J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38:661-666 PubMed
- Pandey S, Mehta DS. Treatment of localized gingival recession using the free rotated papilla autograft combined with coronally advanced flap by conventional (macrosurgery) and surgery under magnification (microsurgical) technique: A comparative clinical study. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2013;17:765-770 PubMed
- Salvi GE, Mischler DC, Schmidlin K, Matuliene G, Pjetursson BE, Brägger U, Lang NP. Risk factors associated with the longevity of multi-rooted teeth. Long-term outcomes after active and supportive periodontal therapy. J Clin Periodontol. 2014;41:701-707 PubMed
- Ramseier CA, Mirra D, Schütz C, Sculean A, Lang NP, Walter C, Salvi GE. Bleeding on probing as it relates to smoking status in patients enrolled in supportive periodontal therapy for at least 5 years. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42:150-159 PubMed
- Woelfel's Dental Anatomy. Schneid RC, Weiss G (2017). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer.
- Tonetti MS, Greenwell H, Kornman KS. Staging and grading of periodontitis: Framework and proposal of a new classification and case definition. J Periodontol. 2018;89 Suppl 1:S159-S172 PubMed
- Ramseier CA, Nydegger M, Walter C, Fischer G, Sculean A, Lang NP, Salvi GE. Time between recall visits and residual probing depths predict long-term stability in patients enrolled in supportive periodontal therapy. J Clin Periodontol. 2019;46:218-230 PubMed
- Ramseier CA. Diagnostic measures for monitoring and follow-up in periodontology and implant dentistry. Periodontol 2000. 2024;95:129-155 PubMed